When it comes to technology in the workplace, how are end users like children?
"They get upset if they don't understand it, and you cannot force them to do something they don't want to do," says enterprise mobility blogger Melanie Seekins.
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
Understanding the nature of users is one step organizations must take to embrace a mobile-first approach to technology, as laid out in Seekins' latest post, "Mobile first: What is it, how do we get there?"
Seekins, a mobility architect at a financial services firm, defines mobile first as the idea that "users would rather pick up [a] phone or tablet instead of a laptop." But to accommodate that notion, an organization needs to answer several questions around usability, policy, security and, of course, cost.
Mobile first and other adoption trends were hot topics in the blogosphere over the past month. Check out what others had to say:
How not to measure mobile ROI
If you successfully address the concerns around usability, policy and security, you're off to a good start in terms of realizing a return on your mobility investment. But how do you know for sure?
Using adoption to measure return on investment (ROI) isn't a good idea, according to Benjamin Robbins, principal at mobile consulting firm Palador. In his new blog post, Robbins argues that ROI is more difficult to measure with mobile technology, and that just because users are doing work on smartphones and tablets, it doesn't mean they're contributing any more to the bottom line.
"A lot of people performing a particular action is not the same as the right people performing the right action," he writes. "Technology has to advance the underlying business objective. No amount of adoption will overcome misdirection."
What's Android's real problem?
More on mobile-first enterprise computing
Mobile first driving SMB business processes
Questioning the mobile-first mentality
Operating system choice also factors into the success of a mobility initiative, and Android has suffered from the perception that it's not secure enough for the enterprise. Eric Klein, senior analyst at VDC Research, says fragmentation -- not security -- is Android's real problem.
"The good news is that many of the exploits are limited to older versions of the operating system," Klein writes. "The bad news is that more than 50% of the Android devices in use are on versions prior to v4.0. … This platform fragmentation will persist as a problem, as handset OEMs continue to sell pre-v4.0 devices."
Security improvements in the most recent version, Android 4.2 Jelly Bean, include address space layout randomization and data execution prevention. Some device manufacturers also add their own security features, such as those in the Samsung for Enterprise program.